Log in

Create a user profile using your existing professional profile on LinkedIn, Academia, or ResearchGate.


Alternatively, register a username and password to start an account.


By creating an account you will be able to contribute articles, engage in discussion groups, network with fellow professionals and businesses, and receive interest-related alerts.

Forgot Password

Please enter your email address below and you will receive a temporary link to re-activate your account

Urban Inequality

Theory, Evidence and Method in Johannesburg

Article image

Owen Crankshaw

27 January 2022

English

uKESA Librarian 3

Book

Africa

Based on new evidence that challenges existing theories of urban inequality, Crankshaw argues in his book, Urban Inequality, that the changing pattern of earnings and occupational inequality in Johannesburg is better described by the professionalism of employment alongside high-levels of chronic unemployment.

Central to this examination is that the social polarisation hypothesis, which is accepted by many, is simply wrong in the case of Johannesburg. Ultimately, Crankshaw posits that the post-Fordist, post-apartheid period is characterised by a completely new division of labour that has caused new forms of racial inequality. That racial inequality in the post-apartheid period is not the result of the persistence of apartheid-era causes, but is the result of new causes that have interacted with the historical effects of apartheid to produce new patterns of racial inequality.

 

Abstract based on source.

Downloads

Website References

Built environment

Finance

Human settlements

Johannesburg

Labour

Land

Livelihoods

Peri-urban

Post-apartheid

Poverty & inequality

South Africa

Unemployment

Urban

View Contributors:

Comments

No comments available
LOAD MORE